Kawasaki Ninja 650 versus Yamaha R7

Kawasaki Ninja 650

Supersport

Yamaha R7

Supersport

Is the Kawasaki Ninja 650 a super sports car or not?

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore in Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor... weiter

Kawasaki Ninja 650 im Test

Gallery

The new super sports car of the middle class in everyday testing.

With the new R7, Yamaha finally closes the gap between the R3 and the R1. Although the R7 has the ever-popular CP2 engine of the MT-07, it is otherwise a completely different motorcycle. How it feels, ... weiter

Yamaha R7 im Test

Gallery

Year of construction / RRP / Test report

Built von 2017 bis 2024~

Built von 2021 bis 2024~

RRP 8.245 €

RRP 10.249 €

Ausführliches Test-Video von Motorradtest.de

waveform

Competitors

Pros:

manoeuvrable bike with a lot of riding fun
reasonable seating position
good workmanship
TFT display with Handy-Connect

Pros:

Transmission and clutch precise and smooth running
lively engine with wide usable speed range
light, agile, sporty
accessible sportsman for everyone

Cons:

Performance okay, but not a burner

Cons:

Sitting position tiring in the long run
technically very spartan equipped
optional QuickShifter without blipper

Dimensions & Weight

Wheelbase: 1.410 mm
Length : 2.055 mm Height : 1.135 mm
Seat : 790 mm
Weight : 193 kg

Wheelbase: 1.395 mm
Length : 2.070 mm Height : 1.160 mm
Seat : 835 mm
Weight : 188 kg

Engine

Motor design: Number 2 Cylinder
Displacement: 649 ccm
Hub: 60 mm
Hole: 83 mm
Cooling: flüssig
Drive: Kette
Aisles: 6

Motor design: Reihentwin 2 Cylinder
Displacement: 689 ccm
Hub: 69 mm
Hole: 80 mm
Cooling: flüssig
Drive: Kette
Aisles: 6

Performance

Maximum speed: 205 km/h
Performance: 68 HP at 8.000 U/Min
Torque: 66 NM bei 6.500 U/Min

Tank contents: 15 Litre

Maximum speed: 216 km/h
Performance: 73 HP at 8.750 U/Min
Torque: 67 NM bei 6.500 U/Min

Tank contents: 13 Litre
Consumption: 5 l
Reach: 289 km

Chassis

Frame type:
Lattice tube (steel)

Front suspension:
41 mm telescopic fork (travel 125 mm)

Rear suspension:
Mono strut (travel 130 mm)
Rear suspension:
Two-arm swingarm

Tyres at the front: 120/70ZR17M/C (58W)
Rear tyres: 160/60ZR17M/C (69W)

Frame type:
Tubular bridge frame (steel)

Front suspension:
Upside-down (travel 130 mm)

Rear suspension:
Central strut hinged via lever system, rebound and preload adjustable (spring travel 130 mm)
Rear suspension:
Two-arm swingarm

Tyres at the front: 120/70ZR17M/C (58W) (tubeless)
Rear tyres: 180/55ZR17M/C (73W) (tubeless)

Brakes

Front brake
Double disc (∅ 300 mm) Rear brake
Disc (∅ 220 mm)

Front brake
Hydraulic double disc brake (∅ 298 mm) Rear brake
Hydraulic disc brake (∅ 245 mm)

Result

Dummy Text. This dummy text is not very informative.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua.

At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur

Der Objektverweis wurde nicht auf eine Objektinstanz festgelegt.
bei Modules__MT_BikeVergleich._Closure$__._Lambda$__44-0(XElement p1) in D:\CMS_2015\motorradtest2020\www215dll-MT-live\Modules\_MT-BikeVergleich\BikeVergleich.ascx.vb:Zeile 444.bei System.Linq.Enumerable.WhereEnumerableIterator`1.MoveNext()bei System.Linq.Enumerable.LastOrDefault[TSource](IEnumerable`1 source)bei Modules__MT_BikeVergleich.GetFazitHtml() in D:\CMS_2015\motorradtest2020\www215dll-MT-live\Modules\_MT-BikeVergleich\BikeVergleich.ascx.vb:Zeile 443.