Yamaha Tracer 9 GT Plus versus BMW S 1000 XR
Yamaha Tracer 9 GT Plus
Crossover
BMW S 1000 XR
Crossover
Year of construction / RRP / Test report
Built von 2023 bis 2024~
Built von 2015 bis 2024~
RRP 16.899 €
RRP 19.690 €
waveform
waveform
Competitors
Pros:
- complete technical equipment in series
- magnificent triple with plenty of steam
- semi-active chassis
- strong brakes
- 30 liter suitcase included
Pros:
- Seating position fits small and big people
- High-revving motor
- Strong brakes
- Very good standard equipment
Cons:
- limited off-road capabilities
Cons:
- You just always want to step on the gas
Dimensions & Weight
Wheelbase: 1.500 mm
Length : 2.175 mm Height : 1.430 mm
Seat : 825 mm
Weight : 223 kg
Length : 2.175 mm Height : 1.430 mm
Seat : 825 mm
Weight : 223 kg
Wheelbase: 1.541 mm
Length : 2.156 mm Height : 1.460 mm
Seat : 850 mm
Weight : 227 (max: 450 ) kg
Length : 2.156 mm Height : 1.460 mm
Seat : 850 mm
Weight : 227 (max: 450 ) kg
Engine
Motor design: 3-cylinder series, four-stroke 3 Cylinder
Displacement: 890 ccm
Hub: 62 mm
Hole: 78 mm
Cooling: flüssig
Drive: Kette
Aisles: 6
Displacement: 890 ccm
Hub: 62 mm
Hole: 78 mm
Cooling: flüssig
Drive: Kette
Aisles: 6
Motor design: Number 4 Cylinder
Displacement: 999 ccm
Hub: 50 mm
Hole: 80 mm
Cooling: flüssig
Drive: Kette
Aisles: 6
Displacement: 999 ccm
Hub: 50 mm
Hole: 80 mm
Cooling: flüssig
Drive: Kette
Aisles: 6
Performance
Maximum speed: 210 km/h
Performance: 119 HP at 10.000 U/Min
Torque: 93 NM bei 7.000 U/Min Tank contents: 19 Litre
Consumption: 5 l
Reach: 374 km
Performance: 119 HP at 10.000 U/Min
Torque: 93 NM bei 7.000 U/Min Tank contents: 19 Litre
Consumption: 5 l
Reach: 374 km
Maximum speed: 250 km/h
Performance: 170 HP at 11.000 U/Min
Torque: 114 NM bei 9.250 U/Min Tank contents: 20 Litre
Consumption: 6 l
Reach: 323 km
Performance: 170 HP at 11.000 U/Min
Torque: 114 NM bei 9.250 U/Min Tank contents: 20 Litre
Consumption: 6 l
Reach: 323 km
Chassis
Frame type:
Bridge tube frame Front suspension:
Upside-down telescopic fork (travel 130 mm) Rear suspension:
Central strut (travel 137 mm)
Rear suspension:
Two-arm swingarm Tyres at the front: 120/70ZR17
Rear tyres: 180/55ZR17
Bridge tube frame Front suspension:
Upside-down telescopic fork (travel 130 mm) Rear suspension:
Central strut (travel 137 mm)
Rear suspension:
Two-arm swingarm Tyres at the front: 120/70ZR17
Rear tyres: 180/55ZR17
Frame type:
Aluminium composite bridge frame, motor supporting (aluminium) Front suspension:
Upside-down 45 mm (travel 150 mm) Rear suspension:
Central strut (travel 150 mm)
Rear suspension:
Two-arm swingarm Tyres at the front: 120/70 ZR 17
Rear tyres: 190/55 ZR 17
Aluminium composite bridge frame, motor supporting (aluminium) Front suspension:
Upside-down 45 mm (travel 150 mm) Rear suspension:
Central strut (travel 150 mm)
Rear suspension:
Two-arm swingarm Tyres at the front: 120/70 ZR 17
Rear tyres: 190/55 ZR 17
Brakes
Front brake
Hydraulic double disc brake (∅ 298 mm) Rear brake
Single disc (∅ 267 mm)
Hydraulic double disc brake (∅ 298 mm) Rear brake
Single disc (∅ 267 mm)
Front brake
Double disc brake, 4-piston fixed caliper (∅ 320 mm) Rear brake
Single disc brake, 2-piston floating caliper (∅ 265 mm)
Double disc brake, 4-piston fixed caliper (∅ 320 mm) Rear brake
Single disc brake, 2-piston floating caliper (∅ 265 mm)
Der Objektverweis wurde nicht auf eine Objektinstanz festgelegt.
bei Modules__MT_BikeVergleich._Closure$__._Lambda$__44-0(XElement p1) in D:\CMS_2015\motorradtest2020\www215dll-MT-live\Modules\_MT-BikeVergleich\BikeVergleich.ascx.vb:Zeile 444.bei System.Linq.Enumerable.WhereEnumerableIterator`1.MoveNext()bei System.Linq.Enumerable.LastOrDefault[TSource](IEnumerable`1 source)bei Modules__MT_BikeVergleich.GetFazitHtml() in D:\CMS_2015\motorradtest2020\www215dll-MT-live\Modules\_MT-BikeVergleich\BikeVergleich.ascx.vb:Zeile 443.
bei Modules__MT_BikeVergleich._Closure$__._Lambda$__44-0(XElement p1) in D:\CMS_2015\motorradtest2020\www215dll-MT-live\Modules\_MT-BikeVergleich\BikeVergleich.ascx.vb:Zeile 444.bei System.Linq.Enumerable.WhereEnumerableIterator`1.MoveNext()bei System.Linq.Enumerable.LastOrDefault[TSource](IEnumerable`1 source)bei Modules__MT_BikeVergleich.GetFazitHtml() in D:\CMS_2015\motorradtest2020\www215dll-MT-live\Modules\_MT-BikeVergleich\BikeVergleich.ascx.vb:Zeile 443.
Conclusion - what gets stuck
Man, we had fun with the XR! The standard electronically adjustable ESA suspension really irons everything smoothly and yet this bike still gives you the necessary feedback about the road condition for sporty driving. That's the biggest difference between XR and GS: The XR is always sporty on the road, even if the 4-cylinder can purr at least theoretically like a kitten, that's not what you want as a driver! Better to throttle and loseprint like a cheetah. GS on the other hand: Rather quiet as a lion.Whether the sportiness of the XR has a lasting effect or rather annoys, every driver has to decide for himself. What is clear, however, is that it travels more pleasantly on a GS, because you drive rather relaxed and there is no constant driving jerking or chain care.
The test motorcycle was provided to us by Bergmann & Söhne Pinneberg. There she stands as a guide and is happy about every test driver.
