BMW F 900 GS versus KTM 890 Adventure
BMW F 900 GS
Reise-Enduro
KTM 890 Adventure
Reise-Enduro
Year of construction / RRP / Test report
Built von 2023 bis 2024~
Built von 2021 bis 2024~
RRP 13.750 €
RRP 15.190 €
waveform
waveform
Competitors
Pros:
- really off-road travel enduro
- already in series production with good equipment
- very good brakes
- Very good driving performance
- great ergonomics for standing riders
- many useful off-road features
Pros:
- Brakes and chassis
- not too heavy
- Technically well equipped
- great engine with neat bums
- handy thanks to low center of gravity
Cons:
- slightly smaller tank, range could be better
- Seat very firm
- Turbulence on the helmet from 100 km/h
Cons:
- Tank polarizes optically
- Turbulence and noise on the helmet
- Cruise control switch available, but function must be activated (extra charge)
Dimensions & Weight
Wheelbase: 1.590 mm
Length : 2.270 mm Height : 1.393 mm
Seat : 870 mm until : 890 mm
Weight : 219 (max: 445 ) kg
Length : 2.270 mm Height : 1.393 mm
Seat : 870 mm until : 890 mm
Weight : 219 (max: 445 ) kg
Wheelbase: 1.528 mm
Seat : 850 mm
Weight : 196 kg
Seat : 850 mm
Weight : 196 kg
Engine
Motor design: 2-cylinder four-stroke engine 2 Cylinder
Displacement: 895 ccm
Hub: 77 mm
Hole: 86 mm
Cooling: flüssig
Drive: Kette
Aisles: 6
Displacement: 895 ccm
Hub: 77 mm
Hole: 86 mm
Cooling: flüssig
Drive: Kette
Aisles: 6
Motor design: Row, four-stroke 2 Cylinder
Displacement: 889 ccm
Hub: 69 mm
Hole: 91 mm
Cooling: flüssig
Drive: Kette
Aisles: 6
Displacement: 889 ccm
Hub: 69 mm
Hole: 91 mm
Cooling: flüssig
Drive: Kette
Aisles: 6
Performance
Maximum speed: 200 km/h
Performance: 105 HP at 8.500 U/Min
Torque: 93 NM bei 6.750 U/Min Tank contents: 15 Litre
Consumption: 4 l
Reach: 330 km
Performance: 105 HP at 8.500 U/Min
Torque: 93 NM bei 6.750 U/Min Tank contents: 15 Litre
Consumption: 4 l
Reach: 330 km
Maximum speed: 239 km/h
Performance: 105 HP at 8.000 U/Min
Torque: 100 NM bei 6.500 U/Min Tank contents: 20 Litre
Consumption: 5 l
Reach: 444 km
Performance: 105 HP at 8.000 U/Min
Torque: 100 NM bei 6.500 U/Min Tank contents: 20 Litre
Consumption: 5 l
Reach: 444 km
Chassis
Frame type:
Bridge frame in shell construction (steel) Front suspension:
Upside-down fork, diameter 43 mm, spring base manually adjustable, rebound and compression damping adjustable (travel 230 mm) Rear suspension:
directly articulated WAD central shock absorber, hydraulically adjustable spring base, adjustable rebound damping (travel 215 mm)
Rear suspension:
Aluminum two-arm swingarm Tyres at the front: 90/90 R21
Rear tyres: 150/70 R17
Bridge frame in shell construction (steel) Front suspension:
Upside-down fork, diameter 43 mm, spring base manually adjustable, rebound and compression damping adjustable (travel 230 mm) Rear suspension:
directly articulated WAD central shock absorber, hydraulically adjustable spring base, adjustable rebound damping (travel 215 mm)
Rear suspension:
Aluminum two-arm swingarm Tyres at the front: 90/90 R21
Rear tyres: 150/70 R17
Frame type:
Chrome-molybdenum steel frame, motor is structural component, powder coated (steel) Front suspension:
WP APEX USD 43mm (travel 200 mm) Rear suspension:
WP APEX Monoshock (travel 200 mm)
Rear suspension:
Aluminum two-arm swingarm Tyres at the front: 21 inches
Rear tyres: 18 inches
Chrome-molybdenum steel frame, motor is structural component, powder coated (steel) Front suspension:
WP APEX USD 43mm (travel 200 mm) Rear suspension:
WP APEX Monoshock (travel 200 mm)
Rear suspension:
Aluminum two-arm swingarm Tyres at the front: 21 inches
Rear tyres: 18 inches
Brakes
Front brake
Double disc brake, floating discs, diameter 305 mm, 2-piston floating caliper (∅ 305 mm) Rear brake
Single disc brake, diameter 265 mm, 1-piston floating caliper (∅ 265 mm)
Double disc brake, floating discs, diameter 305 mm, 2-piston floating caliper (∅ 305 mm) Rear brake
Single disc brake, diameter 265 mm, 1-piston floating caliper (∅ 265 mm)
Front brake
Four-piston radial fixed caliper, double disc (∅ 320 mm) Rear brake
Brembo two-piston floating caliper, single disc (∅ 260 mm)
Four-piston radial fixed caliper, double disc (∅ 320 mm) Rear brake
Brembo two-piston floating caliper, single disc (∅ 260 mm)
Result
Dummy Text. This dummy text is not very informative.Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing elitr, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua.
At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consetetur
Conclusion - what's stuck?
More steam, more technology, more fun? After our test, we can answer yes to this initial question. However, owners of a 790 Adventure don't have to go straight to the KTM dealer and buy an 890. The differences between these two bikes are not as great as KTM likes to portray. Nevertheless, the 890 Adventure is the better motorcycle.Competitors are the Triumph Tiger 900, the Suzuki V-Strom 1050 and the Ducati Multistrada 950 - the travel enduros of the upper middle class. The difference from the upper-class thick ships such as the BMW GS 1250 and 1290 SAS is clearly noticeable, but as described above, both advantages and disadvantages are noticeable.
The test motorcycle was kindly provided to us by Motorrad-Ruser from Haseldorf - thank you very much.
